Tnx!
It is simple ... but no way to understand it at the moment:
My first Foto shows situation of a freshly startet Atom with the Toolkit-serial-monitor connected.
The ATOM can not connect the WIFi and so it opens his own AP.
You see the weak yellow signal of the AP despite the ATOM antenna being next to the notebook antenna.
Now I disconnect the toolkit-serial-monitor and connect the Module with the webbased Installer console.
The ATOM restarts ... starts his own AP - VOILA!! with the expected HIGH LEVEL !!
Now I can close that monitor connection an restart the ATOM. And it will come up with the WEAK signal only again!!
As soon as I start connected with the web console the signal is OK .... even if the ATOM is in WIFI client Mode !
So I know now:
The naked Annex32 1.51.6 ATOM starts in any case with low TX_Power. No matter if as WIFI-client or in AP-mode.
The connected web console will lift the TX-power up.
What does the connected web console do that increases the TX-power??? While the TX-power is always low in any other case!!!
And one more detail in the fotos : The Atom running an AP with Annex32 1.48 is the strongest graph at the left side up to chan7, while this module is located in a distance of 1m . With this Annex version 1.48 the TX-level is always high.
As for Full English Breakfast: potential Health consequences did not matter in those days! And it was necessary - cause we did not find a good restaurant and were forced to have fish&chips for dinner )
Smaller WIFI range with Annex32 1.5x
- PeterN
- Posts: 393
- Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2021 7:56 pm
- Location: Krefeld, Germany
- Has thanked: 184 times
- Been thanked: 221 times
- Contact:
Re: Smaller WIFI range with Annex32 1.5x
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- cicciocb
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2069
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2020 1:15 pm
- Location: Toulouse
- Has thanked: 441 times
- Been thanked: 1364 times
- Contact:
Re: Smaller WIFI range with Annex32 1.5x
Hi All,
I'm not able to give any feedback on that subject as nothing should change if the serial is connected or not, in particular for the ESP32 as the serial link continue to be active, even if not physically connected.
I'm not able to give any feedback on that subject as nothing should change if the serial is connected or not, in particular for the ESP32 as the serial link continue to be active, even if not physically connected.
- PeterN
- Posts: 393
- Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2021 7:56 pm
- Location: Krefeld, Germany
- Has thanked: 184 times
- Been thanked: 221 times
- Contact:
Re: Smaller WIFI range with Annex32 1.5x
Good morning Francesco
The healing effect of the web-based console is a nice feature.
The real problem is that the TX power seems to be set to a low level. And unfortunately that cannot be circumvented with WIFI.POWER as the command does not seem to do anything.
The healing effect of the web-based console is a nice feature.
The real problem is that the TX power seems to be set to a low level. And unfortunately that cannot be circumvented with WIFI.POWER as the command does not seem to do anything.
- cicciocb
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2069
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2020 1:15 pm
- Location: Toulouse
- Has thanked: 441 times
- Been thanked: 1364 times
- Contact:
Re: Smaller WIFI range with Annex32 1.5x
If the problem is the power level, I can check in the code.
I remember that I did something for the ESP32-C3 for fixing a H/W design failure of some modules; maybe that fix have some side effects?
I'll check
I remember that I did something for the ESP32-C3 for fixing a H/W design failure of some modules; maybe that fix have some side effects?
I'll check
- PeterN
- Posts: 393
- Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2021 7:56 pm
- Location: Krefeld, Germany
- Has thanked: 184 times
- Been thanked: 221 times
- Contact:
Re: Smaller WIFI range with Annex32 1.5x
Thanks
Yes, it's my ATOM with Annex 1.5x listening to a loudly screaming WIFI AP and only responding with a whisper.
When resetting using the web console, the transmission power seems to be initialized differently.
Yes, it's my ATOM with Annex 1.5x listening to a loudly screaming WIFI AP and only responding with a whisper.
When resetting using the web console, the transmission power seems to be initialized differently.
- PeterN
- Posts: 393
- Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2021 7:56 pm
- Location: Krefeld, Germany
- Has thanked: 184 times
- Been thanked: 221 times
- Contact:
Re: Smaller WIFI range with Annex32 1.5x
To give some more hints:
To locate the version with the problem, I took a fresh erased ATOM and flashed 1.48.22 and 1.49.2 which then show a strong TX power in AP mode and under all power and USB-serial circumstances.
The reduced TX signal appears for the first time in Annex 1.50.5 . However this is a bit hidden, because as long as the flasher is still connected all seems OK after flashing and the automatic restart. But if I close the webbased flasher and reset , then the AP restarts always with weak signal.
And the reduced transmission power in AP mode guarantees that the transmission power in WiFi client mode is also reduced
Edit: Testing with AP-mode activated has the advantage that it is very easy to observe the power of its constantly transmitted signal with my inSSIDer wifi sniffer.
To locate the version with the problem, I took a fresh erased ATOM and flashed 1.48.22 and 1.49.2 which then show a strong TX power in AP mode and under all power and USB-serial circumstances.
The reduced TX signal appears for the first time in Annex 1.50.5 . However this is a bit hidden, because as long as the flasher is still connected all seems OK after flashing and the automatic restart. But if I close the webbased flasher and reset , then the AP restarts always with weak signal.
And the reduced transmission power in AP mode guarantees that the transmission power in WiFi client mode is also reduced
Edit: Testing with AP-mode activated has the advantage that it is very easy to observe the power of its constantly transmitted signal with my inSSIDer wifi sniffer.
- cicciocb
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2069
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2020 1:15 pm
- Location: Toulouse
- Has thanked: 441 times
- Been thanked: 1364 times
- Contact:
Re: Smaller WIFI range with Annex32 1.5x
I've spent some time trying to understand something but I cannot reproduce your behavior, the WiFi.power command works and I have the same wifi signal with the PC connection or using an external power pack.
I modified the firmware to see if inside the power is correctly set and it seems the case; however I noted that, with different power sources (i.e. with a USB power supply) the strength is different. I also noticed that, in this case, the ESP32 reports a max power slightly below the value set.
So, for what I understand, it is probably a question of power source.
edit :
I tested with ESP32 and ESP32-S3 (the esp32 has a max power of 19.5dbm and the ESP32-S3 has a max of 21 dbm)
I modified the firmware to see if inside the power is correctly set and it seems the case; however I noted that, with different power sources (i.e. with a USB power supply) the strength is different. I also noticed that, in this case, the ESP32 reports a max power slightly below the value set.
So, for what I understand, it is probably a question of power source.
edit :
I tested with ESP32 and ESP32-S3 (the esp32 has a max power of 19.5dbm and the ESP32-S3 has a max of 21 dbm)
- PeterN
- Posts: 393
- Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2021 7:56 pm
- Location: Krefeld, Germany
- Has thanked: 184 times
- Been thanked: 221 times
- Contact:
Re: Smaller WIFI range with Annex32 1.5x
Thanks for testing
Did you observe the TX strenght in AP-mode with an external sniffer ?
"Wifi.power 19.5 " for max power ? This or other values did not change anything at my output
Edit: It is not only a question of some few dB
I will test with other then the ESPpico, perhaps this has influence.
Did you observe the TX strenght in AP-mode with an external sniffer ?
"Wifi.power 19.5 " for max power ? This or other values did not change anything at my output
Edit: It is not only a question of some few dB
I will test with other then the ESPpico, perhaps this has influence.
- cicciocb
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2069
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2020 1:15 pm
- Location: Toulouse
- Has thanked: 441 times
- Been thanked: 1364 times
- Contact:
- PeterN
- Posts: 393
- Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2021 7:56 pm
- Location: Krefeld, Germany
- Has thanked: 184 times
- Been thanked: 221 times
- Contact:
Re: Smaller WIFI range with Annex32 1.5x
Had no effect with wifi.power 2 . .... and also not in a slow loop with other values