Page 1 of 1
wifi.rssi an wifi.scan
Posted: Sun May 02, 2021 10:58 pm
by Fernando Perez
I am studying the Annex instructions regarding Wifi and there is one thing I do not understand.
wifi.rssi always gives me a different value than the one I get through wifi.scan.
Is there something wrong with my program or functions?
Code: [Local Link Removed for Guests]
DIM mode$(3) = "sleep", "STATION", "AP", "AP+STA"
ssid$ = "MIWIFI_2G_Tmct"
wlog "Mode: " + mode$(wifi.mode)
wlog "Signal: " + str$(wifi.rssi) + " db (" + str$((wifi.rssi+100)/100*110) + "%)"
wlog "Channel: " + str$(wifi.channel) + chr$(13)
wifi.scan
while wifi.networks(a$) = -1
wend
wlog a$ + chr$(13)
ioBuff.dim(0, 1000)
ioBuff.fromString(0, a$)
i = 0
do
i = i + 1
loop until ioBuff.toString$(0, i, len(ssid$)) = ssid$
wlog "MAC: " + ioBuff.toString$(0, i + len(ssid$) + 1, 17)
signal$ = ioBuff.toString$(0, i + len(ssid$) + 19, 3)
wlog "Signal: " + signal$ + " db"
Re: wifi.rssi an wifi.scan
Posted: Mon May 03, 2021 3:51 pm
by cicciocb
Hi Fernando,
what do you mean exactly for "always different" ?
In fact, the RSSI information do not seems to be very stable.
For example, using this snippet extracted from your program
Code: [Local Link Removed for Guests]
DIM mode$(3) = "sleep", "STATION", "AP", "AP+STA"
while 1
wlog "Mode: " + mode$(wifi.mode)
wlog "Signal: " + str$(wifi.rssi) + " db (" + str$((wifi.rssi+100)/100*110) + "%)"
wlog "Channel: " + str$(wifi.channel) + chr$(13)
wend
Shows this result on one of my modules :
Code: [Local Link Removed for Guests]
Mode: STATION
Signal: -45 db (60.5%)
Channel: 11
Mode: STATION
Signal: -49 db (56.1%)
Channel: 11
Mode: STATION
Signal: -49 db (56.1%)
Channel: 11
Mode: STATION
Signal: -47 db (58.3%)
Channel: 11
Mode: STATION
Signal: -45 db (60.5%)
Channel: 11
Mode: STATION
Signal: -45 db (60.5%)
Channel: 11
Mode: STATION
Signal: -46 db (59.4%)
Channel: 11
Mode: STATION
Signal: -46 db (59.4%)
Channel: 11
Mode: STATION
Signal: -47 db (58.3%)
Channel: 11
Mode: STATION
Signal: -47 db (58.3%)
Channel: 11
Mode: STATION
Signal: -43 db (62.7%)
Channel: 11
Mode: STATION
Signal: -43 db (62.7%)
Channel: 11
Mode: STATION
Signal: -47 db (58.3%)
Channel: 11
Mode: STATION
Signal: -46 db (59.4%)
Channel: 11
Mode: STATION
Signal: -46 db (59.4%)
Channel: 11
Mode: STATION
Signal: -44 db (61.6%)
Channel: 11
Mode: STATION
Signal: -44 db (61.6%)
Channel: 11
Mode: STATION
Signal: -47 db (58.3%)
Channel: 11
Mode: STATION
Signal: -47 db (58.3%)
Channel: 11
Mode: STATION
Signal: -45 db (60.5%)
Channel: 11
Mode: STATION
Signal: -45 db (60.5%)
Channel: 11
Mode: STATION
Signal: -47 db (58.3%)
Channel: 11
Mode: STATION
Signal: -47 db (58.3%)
Channel: 11
Mode: STATION
Signal: -47 db (58.3%)
Channel: 11
Mode: STATION
Signal: -46 db (59.4%)
Channel: 11
Mode: STATION
Signal: -46 db (59.4%)
Channel: 11
Mode: STATION
Signal: -44 db (61.6%)
Channel: 11
Mode: STATION
Signal: -44 db (61.6%)
Channel: 11
Mode: STATION
Signal: -46 db (59.4%)
Channel: 11
Mode: STATION
Signal: -46 db (59.4%)
Channel: 11
Mode: STATION
Signal: -46 db (59.4%)
Channel: 11
Mode: STATION
Signal: -46 db (59.4%)
Channel: 11
Mode: STATION
Signal: -44 db (61.6%)
Channel: 11
Mode: STATION
Signal: -44 db (61.6%)
Re: wifi.rssi an wifi.scan
Posted: Mon May 03, 2021 4:34 pm
by AndyGadget
Deleted by Andy - Answering the wrong question
Re: wifi.rssi an wifi.scan
Posted: Mon May 03, 2021 4:39 pm
by Fernando Perez
Francesco, running the readings continuously, I see that the values obtained vary almost the same as the opinions of our politicians.
But I mean that when I run the wifi.scan command I always get a value several decibels lower than when I get it through the wifi.rssi command.
Look at this:
Code: [Local Link Removed for Guests]
ssid$ = "MIWIFI_2G_Tmct"
while 1
wlog "Signal wifi.rssi: " + str$(wifi.rssi) + " db"
wifi.scan
while wifi.networks(a$) = -1
wend
' wlog a$
i = 0
do
i = i + 1
b$ = mid$(a$, i, len(ssid$))
loop until b$ = ssid$
wlog "Signal wifi.scan: " + mid$(a$, i + len(ssid$) + 19, 3) + " db" + chr$(13)
wend
Do you know what it could be?
What will be the most reliable?
Re: wifi.rssi an wifi.scan
Posted: Mon May 03, 2021 4:53 pm
by cicciocb
Fernando,
in my case I have "around" the same values.
The only explanation I have is that the intensity is not sampled at the same time so the difference exists.
This is the program running on my module
Code: [Local Link Removed for Guests]
Signal wifi.rssi: -55 db
Signal wifi.scan: -52 db
Signal wifi.rssi: -54 db
Signal wifi.scan: -56 db
Signal wifi.rssi: -54 db
Signal wifi.scan: -54 db
Signal wifi.rssi: -56 db
Signal wifi.scan: -54 db
Signal wifi.rssi: -58 db
Signal wifi.scan: -52 db
Signal wifi.rssi: -57 db
Signal wifi.scan: -55 db
Signal wifi.rssi: -55 db
Signal wifi.scan: -54 db
Signal wifi.rssi: -52 db
Signal wifi.scan: -53 db
Signal wifi.rssi: -52 db
Signal wifi.scan: -51 db
Signal wifi.rssi: -52 db
Signal wifi.scan: -55 db
Signal wifi.rssi: -52 db
Signal wifi.scan: -55 db
Signal wifi.rssi: -50 db
Signal wifi.scan: -56 db
Signal wifi.rssi: -53 db
Signal wifi.scan: -52 db
Re: wifi.rssi an wifi.scan
Posted: Mon May 03, 2021 5:14 pm
by Fernando Perez
[Local Link Removed for Guests] wrote: [Local Link Removed for Guests]Mon May 03, 2021 4:34 pm
Deleted by Andy - Answering the wrong question
Andy, your work at ThingSpeak is really nice. My goal is simply to mount a meter of the wifi signal that reaches my ESP8266 module to determine what is the best placement in the different rooms of a house.
But I see that it will not be very reliable as there are so many differences from one second to another, without even moving the module.
Re: wifi.rssi an wifi.scan
Posted: Mon May 03, 2021 5:19 pm
by Fernando Perez
It's funny, Francesco. This is what I get.
image.png
I will investigate in case I am doing it on a faulty module or any other reason. Thank you.
Re: wifi.rssi an wifi.scan
Posted: Mon May 03, 2021 7:24 pm
by AndyGadget
Thanks Fernando. I didn't pick up on the RSSI / Scan discrepancy which was the main point of your post.
I'll be posting the greenhouse monitor as a project once I've done a bit more work on the monitor display.
If you're looking for relative strength between rooms, I'd just choose either RSSI or Scan and take an average of 10 readings.
A couple of db either way won't make much difference.
Re: wifi.rssi an wifi.scan
Posted: Wed May 12, 2021 10:13 am
by dMajo
[Local Link Removed for Guests] wrote: [Local Link Removed for Guests]Mon May 03, 2021 7:24 pm
...
A couple of db either way won't make much difference.
Except that the voltage doubles every 6 dB while the power doubles every 3 dB
Re: wifi.rssi an wifi.scan
Posted: Wed May 12, 2021 12:07 pm
by AndyGadget
[Local Link Removed for Guests] wrote: [Local Link Removed for Guests]Wed May 12, 2021 10:13 am
...
A couple of db either way won't make much difference.
Except that the voltage doubles every 6 dB while the power doubles every 3 dB
[/quote]
True, but as Fernando is using this for room to room comparative measurements, largely irrelevant. The usable range is enormous.
From experience I've found around -25dB sitting next to a router, a sharp increase in packet loss starting around -70db and just forget it at -80dB.
My greenhouse monitor data at
https://thingspeak.com/channels/1283507 is spot-sampled each time it wakes up (every 10 minutes) and currently shows a variation of 9dB. (Graph is actually 100 + RSSI.)